|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 21 post(s) |
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
496
|
Posted - 2014.05.25 15:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote: On the bright side however, we are working on ways to remove offline Control Towers. It's still in early design and with our team bandwidth being quite full for Crius, this will have to wait after that, but it's definitely on the menu.
How about once they are offlined/run out of fuel they lose shields, followed by taking armour then hull damage gradually from micrometeor strikes etc. Just think of the queues of people waiting for the best point to take down the tower :) |
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
513
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 15:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote: On the bright side however, we are working on ways to remove offline Control Towers. It's still in early design and with our team bandwidth being quite full for Crius, this will have to wait after that, but it's definitely on the menu.
How about once they are offlined/run out of fuel they lose shields, followed by taking armour then hull damage gradually from micrometeor strikes etc. Just think of the queues of people waiting for the best point to take down the tower :) Or they could just go "SPLAT" after 30 days of no fuel... Stop trying to reinvent the wheel.
Clearly they are having to 'invent' some mechanism to get rid of them. Simple degradation is the most realistic and straightforward. How long do you think the ISS would last in orbit without regular shifts to avoid debris?
|
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
514
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 18:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
Karash Amerius wrote:Dear All,
I fully embrace and respect non PVP professions in this game -K
All professions are PvP one way or another |
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
576
|
Posted - 2014.06.21 10:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
This wouldallow for sticks to be maintained relatively cheaply by restocking stront though. I still preferthe idea of shields goingdown when the tower is offlined and continual damage being done by meteorite strikes etc that way the owner not onlly has to online again but has to repair the tower. |
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
587
|
Posted - 2014.07.04 09:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
A'Tolkar wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:A'Tolkar wrote:Please allow the anchoring of reaction arrays in any security status solar system, not just < 0.4. While you are at it, allow the same for Small Mobile 'Rote'/'Hybrid' Siphon.
Thank you. Why ? If lowsec is too dangerous for you - Don't moon mine, that's easy. You want the isk - Take the risk. I never said anything about allowing a moon harvesting array to be anchorable in any sec status. I can refine ore and reprocess modules and process ice come Crius (any sec status). Why not be able to run reactions as well?
I like the idea of allowing reactions in any space, this would encourage more sneaky goo theft with siphons... |
|
|
|